M'Caffrey, Anne. 1998. The Masterharper of Pern. New York: Del Rey.
Reviewed 21 March 1998
Calling this book an embarassment to the field doesn't go far enough. Ms. M'Caffrey's latest tries to rewrite a secondary character's early life story as the focus of an entire "novel" (although that's too grand a term for this garbage). In the process, she points out the ultimate danger of "prequels": unexplainable inconsistencies. Just a couple of examples I noted (and I haven't read the other books in many years):
And it gets worse. Ms. M'Caffrey's prose has never been stellar, although it has usually been professional. I wish I could say the same of The Masterharper of Pern. The verbs are imprecise, as if the writer was desperately trying to find the right word and couldn't. Character names are even worse than usual. Descriptions are, at best, journalistic and visual, and all too often absent.
Aside 1: Reread the previous paragraph. Notice all the weak verbs and false
equivalences? It's a slight exaggeration.
Aside 2: I expect better copyediting from Del Rey. Say what you
will about literary quality, Del Rey's copyediting is ordinarily quite good.
In the first 30 pages, though, I found 13 copyediting errors, ranging from
dubious stylistic decisions to out-and-out misusages. I know what I'm doingI'm
an editor by day.
Aside 2: I expect better copyediting from Del Rey. Say what you will about literary quality, Del Rey's copyediting is ordinarily quite good. In the first 30 pages, though, I found 13 copyediting errors, ranging from dubious stylistic decisions to out-and-out misusages. I know what I'm doingI'm an editor by day.
Serious structural flaws have created all of the above problems in this book. It reads like an adolescent's diary--completely linear and in present tense, very flat and yet overplayed, false pathos overwhelming meaning, no acknowledgement of cultural history. If this book had to be writtenwhich is open to question, although I haven't seen any preexisting option clausesM'Caffrey would have done much better to pull this story out of Robinton through other characters. Conversations with Menolly, Sebell, and Jaxom (maybe even Lessa and F'lar); scraps of writings here and there; reminiscences by other harpers; conversations between dragons, f'gawdsakes! Please, anything other than a self-centered portrait that "shows" what without ever "showing" why!
The Masterharper of Pern shows the danger of rewriting events in series books in prequels, or from other characters' viewpoints. Yes, we can have unreliable narrators, different perceptions, etc. It's not very smart to try this 30 years and (by my count) 13 books apart, though, unless one relies upon a fresh rereading of the books, with careful notes, as they were actually published.
I first encountered Dragonflight in about 1977; it was unsophisticated even then. Maybe a bit more fun than most of what was available, but definitely unsophisticated. I last read any of the original trilogy in about 1983 (yes, I have a pretty good memory); I haven't been able to make it all the way through any of the other books since. I forced myself to finish this book, and I'm sorry I did. I'm very thankful that I borrowed a copy from the library, instead of paying for it.
Intellectual Property Rights: © 1998 John Savage. All rights reserved.
You may contact me concerning permissions via email. This copyright notice overrides, negates, and renders void any alleged copyright or license claimed by any person or entity, specifically including but not limited to any claim of right or license by any web hosting service or software provider, except when I have transferred such rights with a signed writing that complies with the requirements for transferring the entire copyright as specified in Title 17 of the United States Code. This includes, but is not limited to, translation or other creation of derivative works, use in advertising or other publicity materials without prior authorization in writing, or any other non-private use that falls outside the fair use exception specified in Title 17 of the United States Code. If you have any question about whether commercial use, publicity or advertising use, or republication in any form satisfies this notice, it probably does not. Violations of intellectual property rights in these pages will be dealt with swiftly using appropriate process of law, probably including a note to your mother telling her that you're a thief.
"The Savage Beast", "Savage Reviews", "Surreality Check", and the dragon-and-book banner are trade and service marks of the website owner. Other marks appearing on these pages belong to third parties, and appear either with permission or as exemplary references.