Mixon, Laura J. 1998. Proxies. New York: Tor.
Reviewed 11 December 1998
The jacket blurbs call this "post-cyberpunk realism," "a complex tale of thoroughly adult emotions, political intrigue, and cutting-edge technology," "a science fiction novel that examines the grownup issues of children and parenting." I'm not sure I read the same book. Proxies is not a bad book, by any means, but it is none of those things.
I'm going to break one of my normal rules and give a plot summary here. Carli D'Auber is a recently divorced, brilliant communications scientist who has no intellectual property rights in her breakthrough work. That brilliance makes her the target for a very childish conspiracy to steal mankind's first starship. Aside: Patent law used to work the way it's presented, but it doesn't any more, and it's moving farther from that model.
While Carli is the central character, she is also one of the least interesting. The most interesting character is Daniel Sornsen, a "proxy pilot." Proxies are humanoidand maybe morerobots that the pilots inhabit through a brain-software interface. Daniel is a relatively adult pilot. The antagonists (not villains) of this story, though, are several children with serious physical disabilities (hidden at the beginning of the book) being asked to do adult jobs as pilots of advanced proxies.
As is typical in a cyberpunkish novel, the technology questions drive the plot, from:
One silly technical error I can't resist pointing out: On pages 293-95, there is a whole series of numbers off by three orders of magnitude. Human reaction times are measured in hundreds of milliseconds, not hundreds of microseconds. You can find a good discussion of reaction time in any decent textbook on motor learning and performance, such as Richard Schmidt's Motor Learning and Performance. I have no idea where this crept in; knowing what I do about editing, I'd bet on the copyeditor. Most of the other errors I caught were somewhat more subtle, but I was left with a vague feeling of unease about the technical research.
In the end, the book has a feeling of "forcing to fit" about it that just won't go away. The best character is not central to either the problem itself or its resolution; the resolution requires a cheap, poorly-prepared change in personal philosophy; and the presentation of the central moral and ethical questions is just shallow. That said, the novel actually has some characters, it has a resolution, and it asks moral and ethical questionsall of which are significant advances over the typical cyberpunk novel.
Despite these criticisms, Proxies is a novel. It has more to it than just noirish atmosphere, angst, private fortunes, corporate piracy, kinky sex, mind-numbing drugs, and bad rock and roll. Neither are the characters caught up in some odd variant of pseudo-Japanese culture (only Sterling, Gibson, and Cadigan get this right).
And what about those jacket blurbs? Proxies is neither "post-cyberpunk" (because its main conceit is still renegades using direct brain-computer interfaces in the relatively near future) nor "realist" (because the characters don't act realistically). While the technology is cutting-edge, the emotions and political intrigue are childish. This is not necessarily a bad thing, but it is a misrepresentation. Finally, any "examination of the grownup issues of children and parenting" is at best implied as a background fault in some of the characters; those issues simply are not central to the core of the novel.
Last, a word about style. One of the strongest aspects of Proxies is that it works its assaults upon the reader's senses through the events, not the language. One major weakness of much of the cyberpunk movement has been experimentation with language for the sake of experimentation, instead experimentation that advances the writing. This may be an attempt to find a prose version of impressionist and modernist tone poems, similar to Artur Schoenberg--although I don't think the cyberpunkers would appreciate that comparison! Ms. Mixon does not make this mistake. Even the typographical attempts to show simultaneous parallel thought patterns work acceptably.
Intellectual Property Rights: © 1998 John Savage. All rights reserved.
You may contact me concerning permissions via email. This copyright notice overrides, negates, and renders void any alleged copyright or license claimed by any person or entity, specifically including but not limited to any claim of right or license by any web hosting service or software provider, except when I have transferred such rights with a signed writing that complies with the requirements for transferring the entire copyright as specified in Title 17 of the United States Code. This includes, but is not limited to, translation or other creation of derivative works, use in advertising or other publicity materials without prior authorization in writing, or any other non-private use that falls outside the fair use exception specified in Title 17 of the United States Code. If you have any question about whether commercial use, publicity or advertising use, or republication in any form satisfies this notice, it probably does not. Violations of intellectual property rights in these pages will be dealt with swiftly using appropriate process of law, probably including a note to your mother telling her that you're a thief.
"The Savage Beast", "Savage Reviews", "Surreality Check", and the dragon-and-book banner are trade and service marks of the website owner. Other marks appearing on these pages belong to third parties, and appear either with permission or as exemplary references.